22 June, 2012 in Design | 9 Comments

Justin

5 o’clock – the factorial sign needs to be outside of the square-root symbol, otherwise it’s wrong.

Just saying.

Mister

5 is wrong.

bored

Number 5 should have the factorial outside the square root…

Dude 35

5 is not correct, the square root is too long, should end before the “!”.

hbar

5 is wrong. The factorial is clearly inside the square root and thus the 5 o’clock is actually 601.3952191… o’clock.

some guy

I agree with you that’s not right.

field completed.

I still want one though (corrected ofcourse, we should find something that work for the 5)

RDS

5 is not right, since the factorial is supposed to be outside the radical, which resolves radical 9 factorial -> 3 factorial.

Steve

Hey does anyone know if 5 is right? something about it looks funny…

Justin

7:35 pm5 o’clock – the factorial sign needs to be outside of the square-root symbol, otherwise it’s wrong.

Just saying.

Mister

12:10 am5 is wrong.

bored

1:02 pmNumber 5 should have the factorial outside the square root…

Dude 35

8:24 pm5 is not correct, the square root is too long, should end before the “!”.

hbar

9:47 pm5 is wrong. The factorial is clearly inside the square root and thus the 5 o’clock is actually 601.3952191… o’clock.

some guy

4:04 pmI agree with you that’s not right.

field completed.

9:54 pmI still want one though (corrected ofcourse, we should find something that work for the 5)

RDS

5:42 pm5 is not right, since the factorial is supposed to be outside the radical, which resolves radical 9 factorial -> 3 factorial.

Steve

5:57 pmHey does anyone know if 5 is right? something about it looks funny…