22 June, 2012 in Design | 9 Comments
Justin
5 o’clock – the factorial sign needs to be outside of the square-root symbol, otherwise it’s wrong.
Just saying.
Mister
5 is wrong.
bored
Number 5 should have the factorial outside the square root…
Dude 35
5 is not correct, the square root is too long, should end before the “!”.
hbar
5 is wrong. The factorial is clearly inside the square root and thus the 5 o’clock is actually 601.3952191… o’clock.
some guy
I agree with you that’s not right.
field completed.
I still want one though (corrected ofcourse, we should find something that work for the 5)
RDS
5 is not right, since the factorial is supposed to be outside the radical, which resolves radical 9 factorial -> 3 factorial.
Steve
Hey does anyone know if 5 is right? something about it looks funny…
Justin
7:35 pm5 o’clock – the factorial sign needs to be outside of the square-root symbol, otherwise it’s wrong.
Just saying.
Mister
12:10 am5 is wrong.
bored
1:02 pmNumber 5 should have the factorial outside the square root…
Dude 35
8:24 pm5 is not correct, the square root is too long, should end before the “!”.
hbar
9:47 pm5 is wrong. The factorial is clearly inside the square root and thus the 5 o’clock is actually 601.3952191… o’clock.
some guy
4:04 pmI agree with you that’s not right.
field completed.
9:54 pmI still want one though (corrected ofcourse, we should find something that work for the 5)
RDS
5:42 pm5 is not right, since the factorial is supposed to be outside the radical, which resolves radical 9 factorial -> 3 factorial.
Steve
5:57 pmHey does anyone know if 5 is right? something about it looks funny…