• When Modern Teenagers Interpret Classic Art…
  • Seems fair…
  • Evolution of obesity
  • Meanwhile on Google Maps…
  • Restraining Cat
  • Insecurities about college summed up by Daria
  • A seagull on the glass roof
  • Birdbee
  • How you know you are getting old
  • Rainbow Niagara Falls
  • The secret to trolling
  • Hands at gigs
Comments
  1. anon

    5:57 pm

    Anastasia is a warner brothers movie, and therefore not a Disney princess.

  2. Roxy

    4:49 am

    Actually, it’s a 20th Century Fox film…
    Either way, still a very cool drawing :)

  3. anon-2

    5:47 pm

    Haha was about to post exactly the same thing :P Anastasia is amazing, but not Disney :)

  4. anon-3

    3:49 pm

    who fucking cares, you dirty hipsters.

  5. anon3

    2:13 am

    The artist who drew this realizes that Anastasia isn’t a Disney princess. If you look at the actual drawing where it was originally posted, she states that she knew Anastasia is not Disney, she simply felt like drawing her and decided to add it to the mix.

  6. The Fox

    4:25 am

    Creation of Don Bluth: worked for Disney on major princess projects. Hence, people group her with Disney. Milan isn’t a princess, she was just a strong female role, like Megea in Hercules.
    But seriously, the art is great, why get so OVERTLY technical?

  7. The Fox

    4:26 am

    *Mulan
    *Megra

  8. kidda

    4:51 am

    who cares she is the bomb i luv her she deserves to be considered disney

  9. kidda

    4:54 am

    i like what aurora, anistasia, rapunzel, belle, kida, jasmine, pocahontas, and cinderalla r wearing

  10. kidda

    4:54 am

    auroa looks like a taecher

  11. birdy

    7:01 pm

    who cares