• Not impressed…
  • Adventure Time’s only explanation
  • Awesome Christmas lights in Bucharest…
  • No but seriously imagine it this way…
  • I had fun…
  • After graduation…
  • Patrick is always right…
  • Caruso does it again
  • The only Edward
  • You better know how to play it
  • Wassup playa!
  • Judgmental gorilla
Comments
  1. anon

    5:57 pm

    Anastasia is a warner brothers movie, and therefore not a Disney princess.

  2. Roxy

    4:49 am

    Actually, it’s a 20th Century Fox film…
    Either way, still a very cool drawing :)

  3. anon-2

    5:47 pm

    Haha was about to post exactly the same thing :P Anastasia is amazing, but not Disney :)

  4. anon-3

    3:49 pm

    who fucking cares, you dirty hipsters.

  5. anon3

    2:13 am

    The artist who drew this realizes that Anastasia isn’t a Disney princess. If you look at the actual drawing where it was originally posted, she states that she knew Anastasia is not Disney, she simply felt like drawing her and decided to add it to the mix.

  6. The Fox

    4:25 am

    Creation of Don Bluth: worked for Disney on major princess projects. Hence, people group her with Disney. Milan isn’t a princess, she was just a strong female role, like Megea in Hercules.
    But seriously, the art is great, why get so OVERTLY technical?

  7. The Fox

    4:26 am

    *Mulan
    *Megra

  8. kidda

    4:51 am

    who cares she is the bomb i luv her she deserves to be considered disney

  9. kidda

    4:54 am

    i like what aurora, anistasia, rapunzel, belle, kida, jasmine, pocahontas, and cinderalla r wearing

  10. kidda

    4:54 am

    auroa looks like a taecher

  11. birdy

    7:01 pm

    who cares