• Grumpy cat speaks from the heart…
  • Anti-zombie cage
  • Jeremy Clarkson on speed…
  • Getting friendzoned…
  • Rock Concert Audience Evolution
  • ‘Street Name’ means something different in Cleveland
  • Still waiting…
  • The way politics works
  • Rule of Laziness
  • After I yell at my dog for barking at another dog…
  • The Costa Rican sky wave
  • What helicopters do in action movies
Comments
  1. anon

    5:57 pm

    Anastasia is a warner brothers movie, and therefore not a Disney princess.

  2. Roxy

    4:49 am

    Actually, it’s a 20th Century Fox film…
    Either way, still a very cool drawing :)

  3. anon-2

    5:47 pm

    Haha was about to post exactly the same thing :P Anastasia is amazing, but not Disney :)

  4. anon-3

    3:49 pm

    who fucking cares, you dirty hipsters.

  5. anon3

    2:13 am

    The artist who drew this realizes that Anastasia isn’t a Disney princess. If you look at the actual drawing where it was originally posted, she states that she knew Anastasia is not Disney, she simply felt like drawing her and decided to add it to the mix.

  6. The Fox

    4:25 am

    Creation of Don Bluth: worked for Disney on major princess projects. Hence, people group her with Disney. Milan isn’t a princess, she was just a strong female role, like Megea in Hercules.
    But seriously, the art is great, why get so OVERTLY technical?

  7. The Fox

    4:26 am

    *Mulan
    *Megra

  8. kidda

    4:51 am

    who cares she is the bomb i luv her she deserves to be considered disney

  9. kidda

    4:54 am

    i like what aurora, anistasia, rapunzel, belle, kida, jasmine, pocahontas, and cinderalla r wearing

  10. kidda

    4:54 am

    auroa looks like a taecher

  11. birdy

    7:01 pm

    who cares